As the Green Bay Packers head into the offseason, one key free-agent decision they must make is whether to retain running back AJ Dillon. After a season plagued by injuries and inconsistent play, Dillon’s market value has dropped significantly. Given the circumstances, bringing him back on a cheap, low-risk deal makes a lot of sense.
Why the Packers Should Keep Dillon
Familiarity with the System
Dillon has been with the Packers since being drafted in the second round of the 2020 NFL Draft. He knows the offense well and has built chemistry with both the coaching staff and his teammates. Instead of bringing in an outsider who needs time to adjust, the Packers could benefit from keeping a player already integrated into their system.
Quality Depth Behind Josh Jacobs
With Green Bay adding Josh Jacobs as their new lead back, the depth behind him remains a question mark. MarShawn Lloyd, the rookie out of USC, brings excitement, but relying too heavily on a first-year player carries risks. Dillon, at the very least, would provide insurance at the position and serve as a short-yardage or power-back option.
Low-Risk, High-Reward Move
Coming off a disappointing season, Dillon likely won’t command much interest or money in free agency. The Packers could sign him to a team-friendly deal with minimal guarantees. If he impresses in training camp and preseason, he earns his spot. If not, the team can move on without any significant cap implications.
Reasons to Move On
While keeping Dillon makes sense, there are arguments for letting him walk:
Declining Production: Dillon has failed to live up to expectations as a lead back when given opportunities, struggling with efficiency and explosiveness. Younger, Fresher Options Available: With Jacobs and Lloyd on board, the Packers may prefer to use a roster spot on a younger, more dynamic backup. Injury Concerns: Dillon’s health issues last season raise concerns about his durability moving forward.
Final Verdict
At the right price, keeping AJ Dillon is a smart move. He brings familiarity, depth, and a physical presence that could still be useful in the right role. A cheap, short-term contract would allow him to compete for a roster spot with minimal financial risk. If he fails to impress, the Packers can move on before the season starts. Given the circumstances, there’s little downside in bringing him back for another shot.